Thursday, September 18, 2014

Recently, Americans have been subjected to persistent political blather about “1%” of our citizens who, supposedly, “aren’t paying their ‘fair’ share of taxes” in relation to the other 99%. But I’m more concerned about a different 1%–actually about one-half of 1%. This involves current military personnel who provide the rest of America with its peace and freedom. Many of these 99-percenters haven’t a clue about what this 1% has endured on their behalf since our all-volunteer military became a reality.
It appears that many of the protected have short memories when it comes to understanding and appreciating the intense and burdensome sacrifices of these warriors. Being a soldier requires taking personal responsibility for representing one’s country, protecting allies and comrades around you, while attempting to stay alive yourself. This is something a majority of young Americans appear comfortable letting others do for them. Since the end of the military draft system in 1973, most young people have little motivation to serve. A military that is less connected to the rest of society is a condition that does not bode well for the future of military-civilian relations.
Some perceptions about the reality of military service and war are based on the often naive and skewed views of news and entertainment media or politicians who have never donned a military uniform, been separated from their families in combat, or heard a shot fired in anger. One wonders what our Founding Fathers would think about the present path we find ourselves on as a nation when so few are willing to run toward danger in defending America, while so many others are inclined to run away from it. This current civilian disconnect from our military has the potential to turn into a huge democratic dilemma. A majority of our youth invest nothing in the way of personal sacrifices for defending this country, though their entire existence is protected by our military.
Then, concurrently, the first thing politicians and bureaucrats do when budget crunches develop is to go after our warriors…as if they haven’t already given enough for this nation and the other 99%. They’ve suited-up and taken the field while the rest have decided it’s more convenient to be spectators.
Reducing patriotic duty and military service to a matter of personal choice, job options and educational perks may be placing us on a rocky road to potential disaster.
We have lost “fairness” and national resolve that’s born of shared sacrifice. We are losing the sense of unity and sustained support for our military that only comes when all classes of people serve. This form of citizenship has virtually vanished. Something must change if we intend to have sufficient military personnel for future missions and wars.
In addition, our political structure is so dysfunctional that the U.S. Senate only passes budgets when the spirit moves its leadership, which hasn’t been often. We see a government administration and Congress willing to balance deficits on the backs of military veterans while completely disregarding their own despicable history of wasteful spending that has helped create a current out-of-control fiscal debacle. It’s hypocritical of these politicians—most of whom have never served one minute in any branch of service—to laud the military when it successfully confronts terrorists and then does everything possible not to fund it with adequate resources and monetary compensation for its soldiers.
Our warriors carry out the nation’s defense policies. They should be rewarded for service that has included countless deployments in war zones year after year. Children are separated from their parents for long periods of time which promotes insecurity and depression. Family separations also create higher divorce and possibly even suicide rates. In addition, their physical wounds and psychological trauma from combat may last a lifetime.
As a retired combat veteran myself, I’m appalled that politicians spend billions on pet projects to get reelected, fail in their duty to provide adequate waste, fraud and abuse oversight, then demand that those who risk the most for this country sacrifice even more, which often includes their lives. A cynic once said that we learn from history that we learn nothing from history. Herein lies the rub.
The human and animal participants in the following combat events happened 45 years ago in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War. All that is left—after many of the enlisted men and officer/aviators have passed on to their eternal rewards—are reoccurring thoughts of those remaining who remember our unique combat comradeship and the close companionship we experienced with a menagerie of dogs and one Vietnamese pig in our unit.
The 236th Medical Detachment (Helicopter Ambulance) was located at Red Beach on the scenic shore of Da Nang Harbor in Da Nang, South Vietnam in 1969-1970. Our 50-man unit was authorized six UH-1H (Huey) helicopters. They were used to evacuate wounded and dead soldiers and civilians, from both sides of the action, to battalion aid stations located at Landing Zones Baldy and Hawk Hill and to a variety of hospitals in Da Nang.
I soon learned that war was emotionally, psychologically, physically and spiritually disturbing. It was a world of creative cruelty…like being invited to a suicide you didn’t want to commit. Intense combat action reminded me that it wasn’t always supposed to make sense. Life in this realm was contradictory. It was bloody. It was messy. It could also be silly, stupid and scary. And it was often so dangerous that even some pilots might have been tempted to mirror the actions of Air Force Captain Yossarian, a bombardier in Joseph Heller’s classic WWII novel Catch-22, who often checked himself into the base hospital with fake maladies in an attempt to keep from having to go on bombing missions. He was afraid of being killed and just wanted the carnage to stop.
In my own case as a U.S. Army captain, assigned as detachment operations officer and later unit commander, it involved flying 987 medical evacuation (“Dust Off”) missions where seven of my aircraft were shot up by enemy fire and I was twice shot down in one year. During those missions and emergency moments, I quickly realized that everything in combat I thought I could control was a little like attempting to put an octopus in bed.
When I first arrived at Red Beach, there were only two dogs in our detachment: Big Dusty and Jackie. Big Dusty was a large white Alpha male and Jackie, his sister, was a smaller white female whose hindquarters had been partially run over by a wheel of the unit’s 1/4–ton Jeep. An enlisted driver hadn’t noticed her lying under the vehicle in an attempt to escape the blistering Asian sun. A flight crew evacuated her to the only military veterinarian in Da Nang who was located near Marble Mountain Airfield next to the South China Sea on the east edge of Da Nang. She recovered but was forever saddled with a distinctive limp once her wounds healed.
It wasn’t long after this accident when a variety of other dogs began to mysteriously appear in enlisted and officer hootches. It was obvious clandestine contacts had been forged in the local community, when individuals weren’t on flight duty, and word had gotten around despite the frustrating language barrier. Money talked and allowed these animals to walk into a community of foreigners.
This was something that has occurred with American soldiers in every war our country ever fought. It wasn’t long before most of us realized that these four-legged fur balls were having a positive effect on unit personnel. And rumors abounded that some Vietnamese civilians had a yen for roasted dog. So that had been used by many American soldiers as a valid excuse to rescue these cuddly canine creatures from what they believed was an unsavory and unacceptable fate.
Another reason was that these young soldiers, whose average age during this war was nineteen, were often apprehensive and afraid a long way from home. These dogs helped to fill a void reminiscent of other pets they’d been surrounded by while growing up. When they took responsibility for an animal’s needs, it helped take their minds off what they were forced to experience and witness nearly every day. It was apparent that they relished the unconditional love these animals brought to their combat world. This was a win-win proposition all the way around.
A dog’s innate nature to please and its constant presence reminded us that we weren’t alone. We interacted with them as if we were still 12-year-olds. In a traumatic world that seemed remote and unreal most of the time, they helped to quiet the confusing voices and persistent noise in our heads. Even grown boys without an animal companion can often seem like a body without a soul. Nothing can be as beneficial for soldier morale as adequate sleep, good food, letters from home and being surrounded by playful dogs.
Most of the time flight crews would return from dangerous and haunting missions looking and smelling like refugees from The Grapes of Wrath. Yet we could always count on this canine contingent being there to greet us, their tails wagging like windshield wipers, when our ¾-ton truck ferried pilots, medics and crew chiefs back to operations from our flight line next to the beach. When we dismounted, they’d vie with each other for position and surround us as though we were rock stars or gods of the universe. They always managed to wring smiles from even the weariest and most frazzled of crewmembers. And they weren’t impressed by anyone’s rank when they nuzzled a hand or exposed arm with a wet nose or tongue to welcome us back.
Captain Robert Robeson and Little Dusty outside 236th Medical Detachment operations at Red Beach in Da Nang, South Vietnam on March 7, 1970. (Photo by Bild am Sonntag, a West German newspaper, that has given the author permission to use all photos taken that day, and courtesy of Robert Robeson.)
Captain Robert Robeson and Little Dusty outside 236th Medical Detachment operations at Red Beach in Da Nang, South Vietnam on March 7, 1970. (Photo by Bild am Sonntag, a West German newspaper, that has given the author permission to use all photos taken that day, and courtesy of Robert Robeson.)
I’m not sure which aircraft commander decided to take Jackie out to our field site at LZ Baldy, 25 miles south of Da Nang, where crews would spend 5-7 days on 24-hour standby duty at the battalion aid station. It wasn’t long before everyone knew she loved to fly as much as our flight crews. She’d stand on the radio console between the pilots in the cockpit as though she was an active member of the crew.
Sometimes this field site duty could be a boring exercise if our services weren’t required in our area of operation. Other than preflighting the aircraft and taking oil samples each morning, our major goal was trying to stay out of the heat as much as possible. We’d write letters, read whatever was available and listen to Armed Forces Network radio in our hot and dusty hootch adjacent to the aid station and landing pad. Jackie helped us deal with this downtime and would make her rounds by walking into the aid station and making friends with the doctors and medics when there weren’t patients for them to tend to.
After a number of our helicopters were shot up near Baldy, the pilots decided not to take her on any more missions. It was too dangerous. They realized she hadn’t volunteered for this duty like we had. So she was left in the “Dust Off” hootch where aid station personnel kept an eye on her until the flight crew returned from its mission. When the helicopter was parked in its revetment by the landing pad, Jackie was often observed lying under the aircraft to stay out of the sun.
Toward the end of 1969, one of our commissioned pilots was given a gray puppy as a gift from his girlfriend. She was a nurse at the 95th Evacuation Hospital on China Beach who later became his wife. He named this puppy Little Dusty. She was a teddy bear, a real sweetheart, and the friendliest and most spoiled of all our dogs.
In an effort to bond with her, he took her everywhere…even out to our new field site at LZ Hawk Hill, 32 miles south of Da Nang along Highway 1. Like Jackie, she also loved to fly. A number of times when wounded Americans were being evacuated, she’d bound off the radio console into the cargo compartment and snuggle-up with these patients. It was as though she knew they needed encouragement and a bit of canine love. Our medics mentioned, numerous times, that the wounded would often reach out to pet her. Little Dusty’s presence appeared to quiet their anxieties, help them deal with their pain and was definitely a unique surprise for them in the middle of combat action.
He quickly reversed this decision when more of our birds were shot up. He didn’t want any harm coming to her, so she was returned to Red Beach for her own safety, as happened earlier with Jackie. For the final time, we realized that it only took one iceberg to sink the Titanic and one of David’s five stones to bring down Goliath in the Bible. So it was decided not to put these dogs in harm’s way anymore. Combat flying was our job, not theirs.
The next puppy to show up belonged to a pilot whose alternate call sign was “The Mexican.” He named her Pachuca which had some Spanish connotation that has escaped my memory after all of these decades. She was a light-brown bundle of energy that loved to chase her tail and perform a crazy little dance whenever anyone attempted to pet or pick her up. She was a squirmy bundle of continuous motion and as perpetually antsy as a kindergartner in line for the restroom.
She and Little Dusty became inseparable. They could often be found in one pilot’s air-conditioned hootch, asleep on their backs on the tile floor, with all eight paws pointed heavenward. It was as if they were unconsciously attempting to cool their bellies from the extreme heat outside. We pilots never seemed to tire of laughing at this comical scene.
Jackie, in her favorite spot under a unit helicopter to escape the oppressive heat, at the 236th Medical Detachment field site at Landing Zone Baldy in early 1969. (Photo courtesy of Robert Robeson)
Jackie, in her favorite spot under a unit helicopter to escape the oppressive heat, at the 236th Medical Detachment field site at Landing Zone Baldy in early 1969. (Photo courtesy of Robert Robeson)
Both Little Dusty and Pachuca were as perky as rats in liverwurst. And speaking of rats, this is where our pack of dogs would unite in battling a common foe, much like their human handlers. Vietnamese rats residing in hootch ceilings or under buildings in our compound were not of the Lilliputian variety. Many of them were as large as small cats and some were known to carry bubonic plague, which we’d all been inoculated against. Black Death killed millions in Europe during the Middle Ages. I had already evacuated a number of Vietnamese civilians who had contracted this contagious disease from the bites of fleas that these rats carried.
Big Dusty was a rat’s worst nightmare…the local enforcer. For a rat to expose itself on the ground in our unit area, with him around, was about as smart as shaving your beard with a lawnmower.
When he’d corner one of these sneaky, annoying and potentially dangerous critters—that carried both plague and rabies—the other dogs would block all escape routes and begin barking and growling until he dispatched this intruder on his home turf. Some rats were so big they’d turn and attempt to fight him but that was always a bad decision. After he’d made the kill, he’d often carry the deceased around in his mouth until he’d chosen someone to give it to. He’d drop the carcass at this person’s feet as though he was bestowing a gift. Maybe he was merely making a dog point by attempting to prove that he was actually earning his keep.
(L-R) 236th Medical Detachment unit pilots CW2 Dave Read, CW2 Harold "Pappy" Trafton (Deceased), CW2 Burlin "Sandy" Letcher (Deceased) and Major Gail Bowen hold court outside Pappy's hootch at Red Beach in Da Nang in mid-1969, with Big Dusty also in attendance. (Photo by Robert Robeson)
(L-R) 236th Medical Detachment unit pilots CW2 Dave Read, CW2 Harold “Pappy” Trafton (Deceased), CW2 Burlin “Sandy” Letcher (Deceased) and Major Gail Bowen hold court outside Pappy’s hootch at Red Beach in Da Nang in mid-1969, with Big Dusty also in attendance. (Photo by Robert Robeson)
He and I often had our differences after I discovered that one of the pilots had showed him how to open the spring-loaded door to our rustic, one-room pilots’ lounge. Someone had dragged in a mattress and placed it on the floor so any of us could use it to snatch a few “Zs” in peace and quiet. Whenever I entered the lounge to restock our small communal refrigerator with drinks, he would inevitably be caught taking a nap of his own on this mattress. I’m surprised some of the officers didn’t acquire a retinue of his fleas, too.
Big Dusty couldn’t get out of the lounge until someone else opened the door, but it didn’t appear to faze him. He knew no unit court would ever convict him of trespassing or squatting and that there would never be a penalty for his actions. This dilemma was like putting a mob boss in charge of conducting lie detector tests.
Another benefit of having dogs around was that they were our early warning system if any strangers approached the detachment area. A cacophony of barking would always note their arrival. But new unit members were immediately adopted by these dogs into their inner circle because they were probably viewed as additional possibilities for play, food and rooming accommodations.
After Pachuca arrived on the scene, one of our warrant officer pilots came home with a pig he’d procured from another Vietnamese intermediary. He named it Arnold (Ziffel) after the famous pig on the popular “Green Acres” TV comedy program of that day, even though “he” was actually a she.
Arnold in her pen at Red Beach in mid-1970. (Photo by Gary E. Hagen, a unit crew chief.)
Arnold in her pen at Red Beach in mid-1970. (Photo by Gary E. Hagen, a unit crew chief.)
This pilot built a fenced area for Arnold behind the unit water tower and officer shower, where water could drain, making it a veritable five-star pig sty. During monsoon season, Arnold’s living room resembled a miniature lake of mud and sludge. Here she frolicked in her own little hog heaven with its out-of-this-world aroma.
Every day, this pilot and some enlisted cohorts would bring back mounds of food on paper plates that they snuck out of our unit mess hall. For as long as she was with us, the U.S. Army unknowingly kept Arnold as nutritiously fit and fed as it did its soldiers.
About once or twice a month, Arnold would manage to dig out or escape from her lockup situation. A cry of “Arnold’s AWOL” would resound throughout the compound. This call would usually be accompanied by intense barking from our dog pack that loved to chase Arnold around the unit area until officers or enlisted men could recapture her. It was one of the highlight events for our dogs at Red Beach when there weren’t rats to
One night, someone erected a large sign above Arnold’s pen that said “Officer’s Swimming Pool.” I believe we officers laughed harder about this than the guilty enlisted culprits, who are still anonymous, who’d put it up.
That sign remained intact until Arnold received official orders to depart our unit, over a year later, in a porker swap with Vietnamese civilians. A unit hog roast became necessary due to Arnold’s increased girth, weight and voracious appetite. But unit members had become too attached to this four-legged escape artist to do her in themselves, so they traded her for a pig without emotional bonds to be a surrogate sacrificial swine in her place. To this day, the subject of Arnold and that sign still find their way into letters written to each other by unit members.
Reflecting on this time in U.S. military history, I believe Little Dusty was the most loving and unique dog in that entire pack with her animal personality that demanded to be noticed. If she sideled up to you and was ignored, she’d give a sharp bark like “Hey, you’d better pay attention to me.” And she loved to have her belly rubbed, which would make one of her hind legs go into a spasm. Most of the time, she presented herself like she was the center of our universe. It was as though she were verbalizing the following statements: “Here I am. You dig me, of course. Isn’t it about time to feed me again?”
These canine companions circulated among unit members, both officers and enlisted personnel, to whoever needed an emotional lift at the moment. None of them slept outside. They were either formally invited to spend the night in a hootch or would use their own initiative to procure appropriate quarters. They were family and we all looked out for each other.
I was walking out of operations one overcast afternoon and noticed a pilot sitting with Big Dusty on a sandbagged wall next to the entrance. He had his arm around the dog. When he saw me, he turned to Big Dusty and asked, “Do you mind if I discuss some of my personal problems with you for an hour or so?” Looking back, although it caused me to laugh, there was more truth to that question than may have been evident at the time.
These funny, feisty and friendly animals helped all of us cope with life’s combat burdens, boredom and often brevity. When we were afraid, doubt-ridden or anguished while enduring war’s trauma–that often felt like jumper cables had been clamped to our brains–they helped us deal with these emotions. They were our personal cadre of psychologists, psychiatrists and therapists who didn’t seem to mind living with us on our compound in what most Americans would describe as a third-world ghetto existence.
As any accurate war movie will reveal, consistent exposure to danger, destruction and sudden death can draw men and women together. Being surrounded by animals, with their unconditional love, can lighten this human burden and draw soldiers even closer. It’s still apparent to me that these creatures gave us the extraordinary gift of themselves during our tumultuous moments in ‘Nam. They were a part of our lives for at least a one-year tour of duty and still remain so to this day.
Memories of the companionship and happiness they provided remain vivid with the passing of years…even over four decades later. It’s possible that their hoof and paw prints will remain imprinted on a diminishing group of old combat soldiers hearts for as long as they continue to beat. Perhaps that is the way it was meant to be.

BXP (South Africa)

BXP.
BXP.

Characteristics

Caliber: 9x19mm Luger/Para
Weight: 2.5 kg
Lenght (stock closed/open): 387 / 607 mm
Barrel lenght: mm
Rate of fire: 1000 rounds per minute
Magazine capacity: 22, 32 rounds
Effective range: 50-100 meters

The BXP submachine gun had been developed in the South Africa by Mechem company for police and military use in mid-1980s and brought into production in 1988. It was designed due to significant shortage of arms in the South Africa due to international sanctions against regime. The BXP bears significant similarity to the American-made Ingram MAC-10 submachine gun, having similar general layout, receiver and bolt design, but with some improvements.
BXP is a blowback operated, selective fire weapon that fires from the open bolt. The receiver is made from stamped steel and consist of two halves - upper and lower. The bolt, in closed position, "sleeves" around the rear part of the barrel to save the overall length of the gun. The cocking handle is located at the top of the receiver. Unlike the MAC-10, the BXP has ambidextrous safety lever and separate fire mode selector, built into the trigger - when trigger is pressed partially, a single shot is fired; when trigger is pressed all the way back, gun fires in full-auto. Additional safety feature is a interceptor notch in the bolt that catches the bolt if it is released during the cocking but prior to be caught by the sear.
Another interesting feature of the BXP is a wide variety of muzzle devices, including silencers, heat shields, and even grenade launchers, that allow to fire non-lethal and explosive projectiles by the means of blank cartridge. BXP also features underfolding buttstock, made from stamped steel. The standard sights are of open type, but BXP can be equipped with laser aiming modules and collimating sights.
The rate of fire is relatively high at some 1000 rounds per second but BXP is said to be adequately controllable and accurate.

Modern sniper rifles


The main purpose of the sniper rifle is to destroy valuable targets at extended ranges with aimed fire, and with as few ammunition as possible. In most cases, "the target" means the human being (enemy soldier, armed criminal, terrorist, president etc.), and the "as few ammunition as possible" often means "one shot". The range for sniper fire may vary from 100 meters or even less in police/counter-terror scenarios, or up to 1 kilometer or more - in military or special operations scenarios.
Some sniper rifles, mostly - large caliber ones, used also as anti-material weapons, to destroy, or, more often, render unusable or unoperable, targets such as radar cabins, jeeps, parked aircrafts etc.
History of sharp-shooting traces its ancestry well back into XIX or even into XVIII centuries. Early sniper rifles were standart issue army rifles, selected for accuracy, or privately purchased commercial target or hunting rifles. During WW I and WW II both sides used a lot of general issue bolt action rifles (such a Russian/Soviet Mosin M1991/30, US M1903A4, British SMLE No.4(t), German G98k etc.) fitted with some kind of telescopic sight. Some of general issued semi-auto rifles also were used in sniper role, such as Soviet SVT-40 and US M1 Garand.

bolt action rifle topped with powerful scope for long-range shots

The practice of developing the military sniper rifles from standart issue firearms is still used in many countries. Ususally, manufacturer or special military unit select some rifles for their better-than-average accuracy, then adopt these rifles for sniper role (i.e. convert them from select-fire into semi-autos, add ajustable stocks, bipods, scope mounts etc.). Many of military sniper rifles, discontinued in service or currently in use, such as US M21, German G3-ZF and G3-SG/1, were made that way.
Some sniper weapons were made for marksmen use from the scratch, because the clients wanted some special characteristics, that were unavailable in any service or commercial weapons. One such example - Soviet SVD Dragunov rifle. It was designed on Soviet Army request as a lightweight, powerful and reliable semi-auto rifle, and remains in service for almost 40 years.
But wast majority of sniper rifles, especially - police ones, were designed on existing commercially available hunting or sporting rifles. The best examples - the US military sniper rifles M24 and M40, along with many custom police rifles, were (and still are) built on Remington 700 actions, available for general public in many hunting and target rifles. Famous SIG-Sauer sniper ifles also buil on their (SIG or Sauer) hunting rifles. Some sniper rifles, mostly also police ones, designed on target/sporting rifles. To name few: Blaser R93 Tactical (Germany), Sv-98 and MC-116 (Russia).
In general, all sniper rifles may be rougly separated into 3 major categories: Miltary sniper rifles, Police/Law Enforcement tactical/sniper rifles, and Special purpose sniper rifles.

Military sniper with it's gear and camo suit

Military sniper rifles used by different military units. Along with main requirements for accuracy and sufficient effective range, military use commands some other: military sniper rifle must not be too heavy, because sniper usually must carry it for the long hours, with ammunition and other stuff. Also, military sniper rifle must be extremely reliable in any weather and climatic conditions and could withstand hundreds of rounds fired without cleaning and maintenance and without any loss of accuracy. Third, military sniper rifle must be easy to fieldstrip and easy to repair in field conditions. Also, military sniper rifle often must have backup iron sights, in case of telescope breackage.
Another requrement is that military sniper rifle must use military ammunition, conforming to international war threaties and generally available to the troops. In most cases, military sniper rifle use variants of the standart caliber army cartridges (such as 7.62mm NATO or 7.62x54mm R), specially developed for sniping.
Effective range for the standart-caliber sniper rifles against the single human-sized target may be estimated as 700-800 meters for first-shot kills. To extend effective range beyond 1000 meters, often used sniper rifles, designed to fire more powerful ammunition, such as .300 Winchester magnum (7.62x67mm) or .338 Lapua magnum (8.6x70mm).
Military sniper rifles may be further separated in two tactically diffrent categories: the sniper rifles itself, designed to achieve aimed hits at long distances, and the Designated Marksman Rifles (DMR), designed to provide accurate fire support for line troops. While the "true" sniper rifles usually are bolt action ones, to achieve maximum accuracy, the DMRs usually are semi-autos, such as Russian SVD or German G3ZF or MSG-90, to gain higher rate of fire. But the difference lays more in tactical applianses, than in the rifles itself.
Police / Law Enforcement (LE) sniper rifles are somewhat another kind of tools. If in most military/war scenarios wounded enemy is equivalent to killed enemy, or even better, in LE and counter-terror (CT) scenarios wounded criminal or terrorist may lead to many innocent wictims. Sometimes, the LE or CT sniper must not only kill the terrorist, but hit the particular part of the body - head, or hand, holding the gun, etc. So, in general, LE and CT sniper rifles require more accuracy, but at shorter distances. The majority of LE or CT scenarios require precision shooting at the distances lesser that 300, or even 100 meters. These scenarios also require really few shots per scenario - sometimes one and the only one shot. This also require extreme accuracy and stability of results in any weather conditions. LE and CT snipers also has no limitations on caliber and ammunition selection, so they could select almost any caliber/cartridge they department want, or can afford.
Usually, LE/CT sniper rifles had completely ajustable stocks to suit snipers of different statute, sometimes they got half-of-dozen ajustable screws. This is absolutely unsuitable for military sniper rifles, but for LE sniper rifles, which are usually carried to the point of action in special cases, this is OK.
Many USA made LE sniper rifles are built on the hunting "varmint" rifles. Varmint rifles are small or medium caliber hunting rifles, designed to kill small pests, such as squirrels, rabbits etc., at extended distances. Some LE sniper rifles, such as Remington 700 Police, are simply Remington 700VS varmint hunting rifle barreled actions, bedded into sniper-style stocks.
In Europe, some sniper rifles built on sniper rifles (such as Mauser 66, SIG-Sauer SSG2000, Blaser R93 Tactical), and some built on hunting rifles (such as Steyr Scout Tactical). LE/CT sniper rifles use many kinds of ammunition, from .22LR for training and short-range sniping, to .308 Win, 6.5x55mm, .300 Win magnum etc.
Special Purpose sniper rifles may be, in turn, splitted into 2 sub-categories:
Large-caliber rifles for ulra-long range sniping and ani-material use, and silenced rifles for covert operations.
Large caiber sniper rifles usually built to use heavy machineguns ammunition, such as .50BMG (12.7x99mm) or 12.7x108mm. Effective range of such rifles is up to 1500 meters and above, depending on size of target and quality of the ammunition. General purpose machinegun ammo usually produced not-too-good accuracy, but recently some special "sniper" rounds developed in .50BMG caliber.
Silenced sniper rifles usually are used with special sub-sonic ammunition and removable or integral silencers to produce lower sound report. Sub-sonic ammo decreases effective range down to 300-400 meters, but it's worth. With the correct ammo and silencer, the sound of the gunshot could be easily mised completely at the distances of 100-200 meters at night, or even at 30-50 meters - in daily urban noize.
Sniper rifle Accuracy
The most common way of describing the accuracy of the sniper rifle is to measure average diameter of the circle, that may be drawn arount the group of bullet holes in the target. Usually, the rifle is fired from the rest with groups of the 5 (or 3) rounds, and then every group is measured. Average group diameter is the most common criteria of rifle accuracy.
Today, the thin line between "good" and "poor" accuracy is usually laid in 1MOA group. 1 MOA (Minute Of Angle) is measure of the angle, that formed with the triangle with muzzle as the top and the group as the base. 1 MOA is roughly equivalent to 1 inch group diameter at 100 yards (91 meter), or to 2 inches at 200 yards etc. So, if you read that rifle XXXX shooths 1MOA groups, it means that at 300 yards this rifle could place 5 or so bullets in circle of no more than 3 inches in diameter. Many modern sniper rifles, when loaded with right ammunition, could shoot 0.5MOA, or even 0.3MOA, which mean 1 inch groups at 300 yards, or 2 inch (50 millimeters!) groups at 600 yards (550 meters).